Head-to-Head Analysis

Hawaiian Sweet Rolls vs Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hawaiian Sweet Rolls

Hawaiian Sweet Rolls

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix

Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
357.1 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
3.6g
5.4g
Fat
0g
10.7g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
5.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hawaiian Sweet Rolls and Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hawaiian Sweet Rolls is the clear winner. With 71 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hawaiian Sweet Rolls contains significantly more sugar (17.9g) compared to the milder Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Hawaiian Sweet Rolls offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hawaiian Sweet Rolls or Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix?

It depends on your goals. Hawaiian Sweet Rolls has 286 calories, while Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix has 357.14 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hawaiian Sweet Rolls vegan?

No, Hawaiian Sweet Rolls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hawaiian Sweet Rolls and Au gratin potatoes with cheese sauce mix?

There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.