Head-to-Head Analysis

Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise vs CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise

Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers

CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
265 kcal
Energy
466.7 kcal
2.3g
Sugars
0g
26g
Fat
23.3g
0.5g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise and CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise is the clear winner. With 202 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise contains significantly more sugar (2.3g) compared to the milder CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise or CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise has 265 calories, while CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers has 466.66666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise vegan?

No, Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hellmann's Light Reduced Calorie Mayonnaise and CRISPY SEA SALT Gourmet Crackers?

There is a difference of 202 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.