Head-to-Head Analysis

Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds vs Organic scottish oatmeal

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds

Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic scottish oatmeal

Organic scottish oatmeal

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
600 kcal
Energy
389 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
50g
Fat
6.9g
33.3g
Protein
11.1g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds and Organic scottish oatmeal side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 211 more calories per 100g than Organic scottish oatmeal. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds contains significantly more sugar (3.33333333333333g) compared to the milder Organic scottish oatmeal (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic scottish oatmeal is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds offers a protein boost with 33.3333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Organic scottish oatmeal in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds or Organic scottish oatmeal?

It depends on your goals. Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds has 600 calories, while Organic scottish oatmeal has 389 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds vegan?

No, Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hemp Hearts Shelled Hemp Seeds and Organic scottish oatmeal?

There is a difference of 211 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.