Heringsfilets vs Solid white albacore tuna in water
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Heringsfilets
Solid white albacore tuna in water
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Heringsfilets and Solid white albacore tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Heringsfilets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 172 more calories per 100g than Solid white albacore tuna in water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Heringsfilets contains significantly more sugar (6.9g) compared to the milder Solid white albacore tuna in water (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Solid white albacore tuna in water is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Heringsfilets or Solid white albacore tuna in water?
It depends on your goals. Heringsfilets has 278 calories, while Solid white albacore tuna in water has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Heringsfilets vegan?
No, Heringsfilets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Heringsfilets and Solid white albacore tuna in water?
There is a difference of 172 calories per 100g between the two products.
