Head-to-Head Analysis

Herring Fillets vs Albacore white tuna in water pouch

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Herring Fillets

Herring Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Albacore white tuna in water pouch

Albacore white tuna in water pouch

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
266 kcal
Energy
224 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
15.6g
Fat
3.5g
28.1g
Protein
48.2g
1.6g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Herring Fillets and Albacore white tuna in water pouch side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Herring Fillets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 42 more calories per 100g than Albacore white tuna in water pouch. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Herring Fillets or Albacore white tuna in water pouch?

It depends on your goals. Herring Fillets has 266 calories, while Albacore white tuna in water pouch has 224 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Herring Fillets vegan?

No, Herring Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Herring Fillets and Albacore white tuna in water pouch?

There is a difference of 42 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.