Head-to-Head Analysis

Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) vs Skipjack chunk light tuna in water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce)

Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Skipjack chunk light tuna in water

Skipjack chunk light tuna in water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
210 kcal
Energy
132 kcal
5g
Sugars
0g
16g
Fat
1.3g
10g
Protein
30g
1.1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) and Skipjack chunk light tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 78 more calories per 100g than Skipjack chunk light tuna in water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Skipjack chunk light tuna in water (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Skipjack chunk light tuna in water is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) or Skipjack chunk light tuna in water?

It depends on your goals. Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) has 210 calories, while Skipjack chunk light tuna in water has 132 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) vegan?

No, Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Herring Fillets (curry pineapple sauce) and Skipjack chunk light tuna in water?

There is a difference of 78 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.