Head-to-Head Analysis

Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham vs Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham

Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives

Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
143 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
7.1g
Fat
10g
17.9g
Protein
0g
1.7g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham and Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham is the more energy-dense option here, packing 43 more calories per 100g than Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham contains significantly more sugar (1.19g) compared to the milder Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham or Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives?

It depends on your goals. Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham has 143 calories, while Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham vegan?

No, Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hickory Smoked Uncured Ham and Reduced Salt Large Pitted Olives?

There is a difference of 43 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.