High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor vs Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor

Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor and Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor is the clear winner. With 145 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor contains significantly more sugar (6.45g) compared to the milder Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor offers a protein boost with 50g per 100g, outperforming Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor or Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips?
It depends on your goals. High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor has 355 calories, while Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor vegan?
No, High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between High Protein Instant Ramen Pork Tonkotsu Flavor and Unsalted Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips?
There is a difference of 145 calories per 100g between the two products.




