Head-to-Head Analysis

HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE vs Milk chocolate macadamia cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE

HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Milk chocolate macadamia cookies

Milk chocolate macadamia cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
92 kcal
Energy
520 kcal
3.7g
Sugars
36g
2.6g
Fat
28g
11g
Protein
4g
0g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE and Milk chocolate macadamia cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE is the clear winner. With 428 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE takes the lead with only 3.7g of sugar per 100g, whereas Milk chocolate macadamia cookies contains 36g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE offers a protein boost with 11g per 100g, outperforming Milk chocolate macadamia cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE or Milk chocolate macadamia cookies?

HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE vegan?

No, HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between HIGH PROTEIN SKYR MIT CRUNCHY MÜSLI VANILLE and Milk chocolate macadamia cookies?

There is a difference of 428 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.