Head-to-Head Analysis

Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp vs Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp

Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix

Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
0g
Sugars
42.7g
25g
Fat
1.3g
14.3g
Protein
2.7g
2g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp and Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp is the more energy-dense option here, packing 167 more calories per 100g than Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix contains 42.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp offers a protein boost with 14.285714285714g per 100g, outperforming Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp or Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix?

It depends on your goals. Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp has 500 calories, while Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp vegan?

No, Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Himalayan pink salt lentil chips imp and Wild Blueberry Muffin Mix?

There is a difference of 167 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.