Head-to-Head Analysis

Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips vs Puffcorn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips

Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Puffcorn

Puffcorn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
25g
Fat
39.3g
14.3g
Protein
3.6g
2.3g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips and Puffcorn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips is the clear winner. With 35 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Puffcorn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips or Puffcorn?

It depends on your goals. Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips has 536 calories, while Puffcorn has 571.43 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips vegan?

No, Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Himalayan pink salt quinoa chips and Puffcorn?

There is a difference of 35 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.