Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds vs Fig newmans
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds
Fig newmans
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds and Fig newmans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 223 more calories per 100g than Fig newmans. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds takes the lead with only 23.3g of sugar per 100g, whereas Fig newmans contains 37.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Fig newmans in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds or Fig newmans?
It depends on your goals. Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds has 567 calories, while Fig newmans has 344 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds vegan?
No, Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Himalayan Salted Dark Chocolate Almonds and Fig newmans?
There is a difference of 223 calories per 100g between the two products.
