Head-to-Head Analysis

Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds vs Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds

Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips

Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
405 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
3.6g
7.1g
Fat
28.6g
7.1g
Protein
7.1g
1.1g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds and Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds is the clear winner. With 131 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds contains significantly more sugar (21.4g) compared to the milder Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds or Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds has 405 calories, while Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds vegan?

No, Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Honey Bunches of Oats with Almonds and Jalapeno flavored kettle cooked potato chips?

There is a difference of 131 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.