Head-to-Head Analysis

Honey Chipotle Salmon vs Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Honey Chipotle Salmon

Honey Chipotle Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water

Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
205 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
8g
Fat
0g
13.4g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Honey Chipotle Salmon and Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Honey Chipotle Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 205 more calories per 100g than Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Honey Chipotle Salmon contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Honey Chipotle Salmon offers a protein boost with 13.4g per 100g, outperforming Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Honey Chipotle Salmon or Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water?

It depends on your goals. Honey Chipotle Salmon has 205 calories, while Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Honey Chipotle Salmon vegan?

No, Honey Chipotle Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Honey Chipotle Salmon and Tuna Steak with a little Spring Water?

There is a difference of 205 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.