Head-to-Head Analysis

Honey french dressing contains sugar vs Mama sita's, lumpiang shanghai mix, fried spring roll seasoning mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Honey french dressing contains sugar

Honey french dressing contains sugar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Mama sita's, lumpiang shanghai mix, fried spring roll seasoning mix

Mama sita's, lumpiang shanghai mix, fried spring roll seasoning mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1 kcal
Energy
370 kcal
12g
Sugars
74.1g
15g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
14.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Honey french dressing contains sugar and Mama sita's, lumpiang shanghai mix, fried spring roll seasoning mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Honey french dressing contains sugar is the clear winner. With 369 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Honey french dressing contains sugar takes the lead with only 12g of sugar per 100g, whereas Mama sita's, lumpiang shanghai mix, fried spring roll seasoning mix contains 74.07g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Honey french dressing contains sugar or Mama sita's, lumpiang shanghai mix, fried spring roll seasoning mix?

Honey french dressing contains sugar appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Honey french dressing contains sugar vegan?

No, Honey french dressing contains sugar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Honey french dressing contains sugar and Mama sita's, lumpiang shanghai mix, fried spring roll seasoning mix?

There is a difference of 369 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.