Head-to-Head Analysis

Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry vs Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry

Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists

Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
76.9 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
6.2g
Sugars
3.6g
1g
Fat
3.6g
7.7g
Protein
3.6g
0.9g
Salt
3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry and Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry is the clear winner. With 316 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry contains significantly more sugar (6.15g) compared to the milder Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry offers a protein boost with 7.69g per 100g, outperforming Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry or Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists?

It depends on your goals. Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry has 76.9 calories, while Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry vegan?

No, Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Honey Garlic Chicken Stir-Fry and Butternut Squash Pretzels Twists?

There is a difference of 316 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.