Head-to-Head Analysis

Honey Roasted Sesame Chips vs Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Honey Roasted Sesame Chips

Honey Roasted Sesame Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips

Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
0g
32.1g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
3.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Honey Roasted Sesame Chips and Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Honey Roasted Sesame Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 536 more calories per 100g than Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Honey Roasted Sesame Chips contains significantly more sugar (10.7g) compared to the milder Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Honey Roasted Sesame Chips offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Honey Roasted Sesame Chips or Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Honey Roasted Sesame Chips has 536 calories, while Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Honey Roasted Sesame Chips vegan?

No, Honey Roasted Sesame Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Honey Roasted Sesame Chips and Masa Traditional Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 536 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.