Head-to-Head Analysis

Horlicks classic malt vs Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Horlicks classic malt

Horlicks classic malt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry

Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
377 kcal
Energy
66.7 kcal
13.5g
Sugars
8.3g
2g
Fat
1g
11g
Protein
3.8g
2.5g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Horlicks classic malt and Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Horlicks classic malt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 310 more calories per 100g than Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Horlicks classic malt contains significantly more sugar (13.5g) compared to the milder Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry (8.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Horlicks classic malt offers a protein boost with 11g per 100g, outperforming Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Horlicks classic malt or Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry?

It depends on your goals. Horlicks classic malt has 377 calories, while Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry has 66.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Horlicks classic malt vegan?

No, Horlicks classic malt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Horlicks classic malt and Probiotic Kefir - Lowfat - Raspberry?

There is a difference of 310 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.