Head-to-Head Analysis

Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae vs Sicilian Pistachio

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae

Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sicilian Pistachio

Sicilian Pistachio

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
860 kcal
Energy
223.1 kcal
72g
Sugars
24g
52g
Fat
11.6g
16g
Protein
5g
725g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae and Sicilian Pistachio side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae is the more energy-dense option here, packing 637 more calories per 100g than Sicilian Pistachio. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae contains significantly more sugar (72g) compared to the milder Sicilian Pistachio (23.96694214876g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sicilian Pistachio is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae offers a protein boost with 16g per 100g, outperforming Sicilian Pistachio in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae or Sicilian Pistachio?

It depends on your goals. Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae has 860 calories, while Sicilian Pistachio has 223.14049586777 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae vegan?

No, Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hot Fudge - Double-Dip Fancy Sundae and Sicilian Pistachio?

There is a difference of 637 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.