Head-to-Head Analysis

Hot Honey Ham vs Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hot Honey Ham

Hot Honey Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin

Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
107 kcal
5.4g
Sugars
0.9g
3.6g
Fat
3.1g
16.1g
Protein
17g
2.5g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hot Honey Ham and Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Hot Honey Ham is the more energy-dense option here, packing 18 more calories per 100g than Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hot Honey Ham contains significantly more sugar (5.36g) compared to the milder Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin (0.893g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hot Honey Ham or Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin?

It depends on your goals. Hot Honey Ham has 125 calories, while Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin has 107 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hot Honey Ham vegan?

No, Hot Honey Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hot Honey Ham and Slow Roasted Golden Rotisserie Flavor Fresh Pork Tenderloin?

There is a difference of 18 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.