Head-to-Head Analysis

Hot Links Sausage, Smoke vs Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hot Links Sausage, Smoke

Hot Links Sausage, Smoke

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs

Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
280 kcal
Energy
125 kcal
2.7g
Sugars
0g
18.7g
Fat
8g
18.7g
Protein
14.3g
2.1g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hot Links Sausage, Smoke and Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Hot Links Sausage, Smoke is the more energy-dense option here, packing 155 more calories per 100g than Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hot Links Sausage, Smoke contains significantly more sugar (2.67g) compared to the milder Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Hot Links Sausage, Smoke offers a protein boost with 18.7g per 100g, outperforming Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hot Links Sausage, Smoke or Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs?

It depends on your goals. Hot Links Sausage, Smoke has 280 calories, while Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs has 125 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hot Links Sausage, Smoke vegan?

No, Hot Links Sausage, Smoke is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hot Links Sausage, Smoke and Boneless Skinless Chicken Thighs?

There is a difference of 155 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.