Head-to-Head Analysis

House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy vs Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy

House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing

Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
147 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
17.7g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
40g
0g
Protein
0g
7.4g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy and Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy is the clear winner. With 253 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy contains significantly more sugar (17.65g) compared to the milder Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy or Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing?

It depends on your goals. House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy has 147 calories, while Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy vegan?

No, House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy and Avocado Oil Mayonnaise Dressing?

There is a difference of 253 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.