Head-to-Head Analysis

House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy vs Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy

House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce

Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
147 kcal
Energy
39.7 kcal
17.7g
Sugars
4.8g
2.9g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
1.6g
7.4g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy and Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy contains significantly more sugar (17.65g) compared to the milder Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce (4.76g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy or Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce?

It depends on your goals. House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy has 147 calories, while Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce has 39.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy vegan?

No, House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between House of tsang, stir-fry sauce, szechuan spicy and Meat Flavored Pasta Sauce?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.