Head-to-Head Analysis

HTY Sweet Beef Jerky vs Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of HTY Sweet Beef Jerky

HTY Sweet Beef Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon

Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321 kcal
Energy
165 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
0g
8.9g
Fat
8.9g
32.1g
Protein
17.7g
2.7g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing HTY Sweet Beef Jerky and Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

HTY Sweet Beef Jerky is the more energy-dense option here, packing 156 more calories per 100g than Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. HTY Sweet Beef Jerky contains significantly more sugar (28.6g) compared to the milder Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? HTY Sweet Beef Jerky offers a protein boost with 32.1g per 100g, outperforming Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: HTY Sweet Beef Jerky or Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon?

It depends on your goals. HTY Sweet Beef Jerky has 321 calories, while Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon has 165 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is HTY Sweet Beef Jerky vegan?

No, HTY Sweet Beef Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between HTY Sweet Beef Jerky and Alaskan salmon burgers, alaskan salmon?

There is a difference of 156 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.