Head-to-Head Analysis

Humm Probiotic Kombucha vs Marcona almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Humm Probiotic Kombucha

Humm Probiotic Kombucha

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Marcona almonds

Marcona almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
642.9 kcal
50g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
50g
7.1g
Protein
17.9g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Humm Probiotic Kombucha and Marcona almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Humm Probiotic Kombucha is the clear winner. With 393 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Humm Probiotic Kombucha contains significantly more sugar (50g) compared to the milder Marcona almonds (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Marcona almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Humm Probiotic Kombucha or Marcona almonds?

It depends on your goals. Humm Probiotic Kombucha has 250 calories, while Marcona almonds has 642.85714285714 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Humm Probiotic Kombucha vegan?

No, Humm Probiotic Kombucha is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Humm Probiotic Kombucha and Marcona almonds?

There is a difference of 393 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.