Head-to-Head Analysis

Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake vs BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake

Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR

BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
380 kcal
Energy
324 kcal
38g
Sugars
16.2g
16g
Fat
18.9g
6g
Protein
18.9g
0.9g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake and BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake is the more energy-dense option here, packing 56 more calories per 100g than BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake contains significantly more sugar (38g) compared to the milder BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR (16.2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake or BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR?

It depends on your goals. Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake has 380 calories, while BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR has 324 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake vegan?

No, Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Iced Double Chocolate Sliced Loaf Cake and BISON UNCURED BACON CRANBERRY BAR?

There is a difference of 56 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.