Infused with tuna vs Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Infused with tuna
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Infused with tuna and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Infused with tuna is the clear winner. With 41 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Infused with tuna contains significantly more sugar (2.5g) compared to the milder Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Infused with tuna or Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon?
It depends on your goals. Infused with tuna has 100 calories, while Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 141.176470588235 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Infused with tuna vegan?
No, Infused with tuna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Infused with tuna and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon?
There is a difference of 41 calories per 100g between the two products.
