Head-to-Head Analysis

Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon vs Kettle style potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon

Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kettle style potato chips

Kettle style potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
372 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
25.6g
Sugars
3.6g
4.7g
Fat
28.6g
9.3g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon and Kettle style potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon is the clear winner. With 128 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon contains significantly more sugar (25.6g) compared to the milder Kettle style potato chips (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kettle style potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon offers a protein boost with 9.3g per 100g, outperforming Kettle style potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon or Kettle style potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon has 372 calories, while Kettle style potato chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon vegan?

No, Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Instant Oatmeal Apples & Cinnamon and Kettle style potato chips?

There is a difference of 128 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.