Head-to-Head Analysis

Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar vs Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar

Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips

Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
157 kcal
29.2g
Sugars
0g
5.2g
Fat
5g
8.3g
Protein
12.9g
1.5g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar and Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 218 more calories per 100g than Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar contains significantly more sugar (29.2g) compared to the milder Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar or Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips?

It depends on your goals. Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar has 375 calories, while Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips has 157 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar vegan?

No, Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Instant Oatmeal Maple & Brown Sugar and Plant-Based Teriyaki Chick'n Strips?

There is a difference of 218 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.