Head-to-Head Analysis

INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE vs Whole Fancy Cashews

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE

INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Whole Fancy Cashews

Whole Fancy Cashews

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
2080 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
112g
Sugars
7.1g
176g
Fat
46.4g
32g
Protein
17.9g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE and Whole Fancy Cashews side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1509 more calories per 100g than Whole Fancy Cashews. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE contains significantly more sugar (112g) compared to the milder Whole Fancy Cashews (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Whole Fancy Cashews is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE offers a protein boost with 32g per 100g, outperforming Whole Fancy Cashews in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE or Whole Fancy Cashews?

It depends on your goals. INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE has 2080 calories, while Whole Fancy Cashews has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE vegan?

No, INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between INTENSE DARK 72% CACAO DARK CHOCOLATE and Whole Fancy Cashews?

There is a difference of 1509 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.