Head-to-Head Analysis

Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle vs Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle

Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces

Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
611 kcal
Energy
408 kcal
38.9g
Sugars
12.7g
47.2g
Fat
166g
5.6g
Protein
63.8g
0.2g
Salt
3.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle and Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle is the more energy-dense option here, packing 203 more calories per 100g than Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle contains significantly more sugar (38.9g) compared to the milder Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces (12.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle or Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces?

It depends on your goals. Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle has 611 calories, while Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces has 408 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle vegan?

No, Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Irresistibly Smooth Milk Chocolate Truffle and Salted Cashews Halves & Pieces?

There is a difference of 203 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.