Head-to-Head Analysis

Italian Sausage Sweet vs Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Italian Sausage Sweet

Italian Sausage Sweet

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs

Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
317.1 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
25.6g
Fat
0g
17.1g
Protein
0g
1.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Italian Sausage Sweet and Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Italian Sausage Sweet is the more energy-dense option here, packing 317 more calories per 100g than Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Italian Sausage Sweet contains significantly more sugar (1.21951219512195g) compared to the milder Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Italian Sausage Sweet offers a protein boost with 17.0731707317073g per 100g, outperforming Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Italian Sausage Sweet or Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs?

It depends on your goals. Italian Sausage Sweet has 317.073170731707 calories, while Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Italian Sausage Sweet vegan?

No, Italian Sausage Sweet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Italian Sausage Sweet and Boneless & Skinless Chicken Thighs?

There is a difference of 317 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.