Head-to-Head Analysis

Italian style tomato paste vs Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Italian style tomato paste

Italian style tomato paste

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added

Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
90.9 kcal
Energy
40.3 kcal
12.1g
Sugars
4.8g
0g
Fat
0g
3g
Protein
1g
1.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Italian style tomato paste and Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Italian style tomato paste is the more energy-dense option here, packing 51 more calories per 100g than Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Italian style tomato paste contains significantly more sugar (12.121212121212g) compared to the milder Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added (4.84g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Italian style tomato paste offers a protein boost with 3.030303030303g per 100g, outperforming Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Italian style tomato paste or Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added?

It depends on your goals. Italian style tomato paste has 90.909090909091 calories, while Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added has 40.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Italian style tomato paste vegan?

No, Italian style tomato paste is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Italian style tomato paste and Tomato Sauce, No Salt Added?

There is a difference of 51 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.