Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage vs Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage

Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage and Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage is the clear winner. With 252 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage contains significantly more sugar (4.71g) compared to the milder Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage or Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips?
It depends on your goals. Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage has 212 calories, while Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage vegan?
No, Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Jack Daniel’s Chicken Hot Honey Sausage and Organic Blue Corn Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips?
There is a difference of 252 calories per 100g between the two products.




