Head-to-Head Analysis

Jack link& original beef jerky vs Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Jack link& original beef jerky

Jack link& original beef jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers

Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
317 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
0g
5.4g
Fat
7.1g
35.7g
Protein
7.1g
4.6g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jack link& original beef jerky and Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Jack link& original beef jerky is the clear winner. With 31 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Jack link& original beef jerky contains significantly more sugar (21.4g) compared to the milder Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Jack link& original beef jerky offers a protein boost with 35.7g per 100g, outperforming Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jack link& original beef jerky or Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers?

It depends on your goals. Jack link& original beef jerky has 286 calories, while Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers has 317 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jack link& original beef jerky vegan?

No, Jack link& original beef jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jack link& original beef jerky and Soup & Chowder Oyster Crackers?

There is a difference of 31 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.