Head-to-Head Analysis

Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix vs Werthers original sugar free hard candies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix

Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Werthers original sugar free hard candies

Werthers original sugar free hard candies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
379 kcal
Energy
312.5 kcal
72.4g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
6.3g
0g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix and Werthers original sugar free hard candies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 67 more calories per 100g than Werthers original sugar free hard candies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix contains significantly more sugar (72.4g) compared to the milder Werthers original sugar free hard candies (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Werthers original sugar free hard candies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix or Werthers original sugar free hard candies?

It depends on your goals. Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix has 379 calories, while Werthers original sugar free hard candies has 312.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix vegan?

No, Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jack’s pumpkin patch candy mix and Werthers original sugar free hard candies?

There is a difference of 67 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.