Head-to-Head Analysis

Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese vs Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese

Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint

Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
141 kcal
Energy
392.9 kcal
3.5g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
28.6g
28.2g
Protein
3.6g
1.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese and Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese is the clear winner. With 252 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese contains significantly more sugar (3.53g) compared to the milder Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese offers a protein boost with 28.2g per 100g, outperforming Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese or Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint?

It depends on your goals. Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese has 141 calories, while Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint has 392.86 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese vegan?

No, Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jalapeño Jack Fat Free Cheese and Sugar Free Chocolate Candy Mint?

There is a difference of 252 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.