Head-to-Head Analysis

Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix vs Manhattan clam chowder

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix

Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Manhattan clam chowder

Manhattan clam chowder

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
356 kcal
Energy
45.8 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.3g
1.1g
Fat
1.3g
8.9g
Protein
2.1g
1.7g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix and Manhattan clam chowder side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 310 more calories per 100g than Manhattan clam chowder. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Manhattan clam chowder contains 1.25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix offers a protein boost with 8.89g per 100g, outperforming Manhattan clam chowder in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix or Manhattan clam chowder?

It depends on your goals. Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix has 356 calories, while Manhattan clam chowder has 45.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix vegan?

No, Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jambalaya reduced sodium rice dinner mix and Manhattan clam chowder?

There is a difference of 310 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.