Head-to-Head Analysis

Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic vs Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic

Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz

Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
211 kcal
Energy
485 kcal
42.1g
Sugars
30.3g
0g
Fat
24.2g
5.3g
Protein
6.1g
6.6g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic and Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic is the clear winner. With 274 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic contains significantly more sugar (42.1g) compared to the milder Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz (30.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic or Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz?

It depends on your goals. Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic has 211 calories, while Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz has 485 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic vegan?

No, Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic and Nabisco chips ahoy! cookies original 1x18.2 oz?

There is a difference of 274 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.