Head-to-Head Analysis

Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic vs Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic

Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz

Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
211 kcal
Energy
367 kcal
42.1g
Sugars
76.7g
0g
Fat
0g
5.3g
Protein
0g
6.6g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic and Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic is the clear winner. With 156 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic takes the lead with only 42.1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz contains 76.67g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic offers a protein boost with 5.26g per 100g, outperforming Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic or Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz?

Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic vegan?

No, Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Japanese Barbecue Roasted Garlic and Sour patch kids soft candy freeze fat free1x4 oz?

There is a difference of 156 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.