Head-to-Head Analysis

Japanese style noodles miso vs Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Japanese style noodles miso

Japanese style noodles miso

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup

Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
460 kcal
Energy
49.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.7g
18g
Fat
2g
11g
Protein
1g
3.5g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Japanese style noodles miso and Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Japanese style noodles miso is the more energy-dense option here, packing 411 more calories per 100g than Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Japanese style noodles miso takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup contains 1.73g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Japanese style noodles miso offers a protein boost with 11g per 100g, outperforming Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Japanese style noodles miso or Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup?

It depends on your goals. Japanese style noodles miso has 460 calories, while Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup has 49.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Japanese style noodles miso vegan?

No, Japanese style noodles miso is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Japanese style noodles miso and Southwestern Vegetable Fire Roasted Soup?

There is a difference of 411 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.