Head-to-Head Analysis

Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl vs Concord Grape Fruit Spread

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl

Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Concord Grape Fruit Spread

Concord Grape Fruit Spread

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
190 kcal
Energy
5.6 kcal
7.7g
Sugars
44.4g
1.4g
Fat
0g
5.4g
Protein
0g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl and Concord Grape Fruit Spread side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl is the more energy-dense option here, packing 184 more calories per 100g than Concord Grape Fruit Spread. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl takes the lead with only 7.69g of sugar per 100g, whereas Concord Grape Fruit Spread contains 44.444444444444g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl offers a protein boost with 5.43g per 100g, outperforming Concord Grape Fruit Spread in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl or Concord Grape Fruit Spread?

It depends on your goals. Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl has 190 calories, while Concord Grape Fruit Spread has 5.5555555555556 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl vegan?

No, Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Japanese-Style Teriyaki Noodle Bowl and Concord Grape Fruit Spread?

There is a difference of 184 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.