Head-to-Head Analysis

Jasmine Rice vs Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Jasmine Rice

Jasmine Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Fish

Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
355.6 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
0g
Sugars
6g
0g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jasmine Rice and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Jasmine Rice is the more energy-dense option here, packing 96 more calories per 100g than Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Jasmine Rice takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Fish contains 6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Jasmine Rice offers a protein boost with 6.6666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jasmine Rice or Sweet Fish?

It depends on your goals. Jasmine Rice has 355.55555555556 calories, while Sweet Fish has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jasmine Rice vegan?

No, Jasmine Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jasmine Rice and Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 96 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.