Head-to-Head Analysis

Jr Pumpkin Rolls vs Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Jr Pumpkin Rolls

Jr Pumpkin Rolls

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks

Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
312 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
35.9g
Sugars
3.6g
7.8g
Fat
17.9g
3.1g
Protein
17.9g
0.4g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jr Pumpkin Rolls and Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Jr Pumpkin Rolls is the clear winner. With 152 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Jr Pumpkin Rolls contains significantly more sugar (35.9g) compared to the milder Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jr Pumpkin Rolls or Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks?

It depends on your goals. Jr Pumpkin Rolls has 312 calories, while Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jr Pumpkin Rolls vegan?

No, Jr Pumpkin Rolls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jr Pumpkin Rolls and Harvest Snaps Tangy & Zesty Tomato Basil Baked Red Lentil Snacks?

There is a difference of 152 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.