Head-to-Head Analysis

Jumbo Beef Franks vs Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Jumbo Beef Franks

Jumbo Beef Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
259 kcal
Energy
447 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
21.2g
Fat
21.2g
12.9g
Protein
7.1g
2.1g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jumbo Beef Franks and Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Jumbo Beef Franks is the clear winner. With 188 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Jumbo Beef Franks contains significantly more sugar (1.18g) compared to the milder Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Jumbo Beef Franks offers a protein boost with 12.9g per 100g, outperforming Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jumbo Beef Franks or Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Jumbo Beef Franks has 259 calories, while Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips has 447 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jumbo Beef Franks vegan?

No, Jumbo Beef Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jumbo Beef Franks and Hint Serrano of Sea Salt & Vinegar Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 188 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.