Head-to-Head Analysis

Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks vs Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks

Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey

Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
309 kcal
Energy
160.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.8g
29.4g
Fat
8.9g
11.8g
Protein
16.1g
2.4g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks and Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 148 more calories per 100g than Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey contains 1.79g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks or Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey?

It depends on your goals. Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks has 309 calories, while Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey has 160.71 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks vegan?

No, Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jumbo Restaurant Style Beef Franks and Oven Roasted Cured Turkey Breast & White Turkey?

There is a difference of 148 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.