Head-to-Head Analysis

Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted vs Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted

Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars

Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
347.8 kcal
Energy
600 kcal
39.1g
Sugars
17.1g
0g
Fat
48.6g
0g
Protein
14.3g
0.4g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted and Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted is the clear winner. With 252 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted contains significantly more sugar (39.130434782609g) compared to the milder Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars (17.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted or Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars?

It depends on your goals. Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted has 347.82608695652 calories, while Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars has 600 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted vegan?

No, Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Jurassic world fruit snacks assorted and Cinnamon Almond Grain Free Granola Bars?

There is a difference of 252 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.