Head-to-Head Analysis

Kala Jamun vs Taralli Classico

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kala Jamun

Kala Jamun

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Taralli Classico

Taralli Classico

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
440 kcal
Energy
477 kcal
60g
Sugars
2g
16g
Fat
20g
6g
Protein
10g
0.3g
Salt
2.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kala Jamun and Taralli Classico side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kala Jamun is the clear winner. With 37 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kala Jamun contains significantly more sugar (60g) compared to the milder Taralli Classico (2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Taralli Classico is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kala Jamun or Taralli Classico?

It depends on your goals. Kala Jamun has 440 calories, while Taralli Classico has 477 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kala Jamun vegan?

No, Kala Jamun is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kala Jamun and Taralli Classico?

There is a difference of 37 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.