Head-to-Head Analysis

Kale Arugula Caesar vs Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kale Arugula Caesar

Kale Arugula Caesar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted

Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
1.6g
Sugars
0g
18.8g
Fat
21.4g
9.4g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kale Arugula Caesar and Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Kale Arugula Caesar is the clear winner. With 250 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kale Arugula Caesar contains significantly more sugar (1.57g) compared to the milder Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Kale Arugula Caesar offers a protein boost with 9.41g per 100g, outperforming Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kale Arugula Caesar or Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted?

It depends on your goals. Kale Arugula Caesar has 250 calories, while Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kale Arugula Caesar vegan?

No, Kale Arugula Caesar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kale Arugula Caesar and Great value, tortilla chips, lightly salted?

There is a difference of 250 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.