Head-to-Head Analysis

Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz vs WINT O GREEN

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz

Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of WINT O GREEN

WINT O GREEN

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
418 kcal
Energy
15 kcal
24.5g
Sugars
3g
16.7g
Fat
0g
8.4g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz and WINT O GREEN side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz is the more energy-dense option here, packing 403 more calories per 100g than WINT O GREEN. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz contains significantly more sugar (24.5g) compared to the milder WINT O GREEN (3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, WINT O GREEN is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz offers a protein boost with 8.4g per 100g, outperforming WINT O GREEN in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz or WINT O GREEN?

It depends on your goals. Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz has 418 calories, while WINT O GREEN has 15.015 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz vegan?

No, Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Kashi Cookies Chocolate Almond Butter 8.5oz and WINT O GREEN?

There is a difference of 403 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.